A device-related fistula between coronary artery and left atrial appendage following left atrial appendage closure: Case presentation.

INTRODUCTION: Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure (LAAC) is considered a viable alternative to anticoagulation therapy for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, we report a case with a less common shunt resulting from a device-related coronary artery-appendage fistula (CAAF) following LAAC. METHODS AND RESULTS: A 67-year-old male with a history of LAAC was referred to our emergency room with recurrent chest pain and palpitations and was diagnosed with ischemic angina pectoris. Subsequent coronary angiography (CAG) revealed 70% in-stent restenosis and an abnormal shunt of contrast originating from the left circumflex artery (LCA) to the LAA tip which did not exist before. The restenosis was successfully dilated using a drug-coated balloon, the procedure was safely completed without pericardial effusion. The patient had been implanted with a LAmbre occluder (Lifetech Scientific Corp.) in the previous LAAC procedure. This occluder had a lobe-disk design, and the distal umbrella was not fully opened after release, particularly in the lower portion. This could make the hooks embedded on the umbrella contact the LAA wall more tightly, possibly resulting in microperforation and coincidental impingement of the LCA. The epicardial adipose and hyperplastic tissue then chronically wrapped the perforated site, prevented blood outflow into the epicardium, and ultimately formed a CAAF. CONCLUSION: CAAF is a rare complication after LAAC but may be underestimated, especially for lobe-disk designed occluders. Therefore, CAG is perhaps necessary to detect this complication.

Severe coronary artery spasm during left atrial appendage closure plus catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: case presentation.

BACKGROUND: Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) combined with radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) as a hybrid procedure is commonly performed to treat atrial fibrillation (AF). Although this treatment carries a low risk of coronary artery spasm (CAS), and has never been observed in LAAC procedure, caution still needed to be taken. We presented a case of CAS that occurred in an AF patient during the hybrid procedure. CASE PRESENTATION: The patient was a 65-year-old man with paroxysmal AF who developed CAS during RFCA and LAAC. In this case, LAAC was performed ahead of RFCA. After atrial septal puncture, the occluder was advanced into left atrium through delivery sheath, and successfully deployed in the LAA. After verifying the assessment of "PASS" criteria, we decided to release the device. However, before releasing the occluder in LAAC, the patient's blood pressure (BP) fell to 70/45 mmHg with heart rate (HR) drop and ST-segment elevation in II, III, and aVF and reciprocal ST-segment depression in I and aVL. Isotonic sodium chloride load was administered. After 3 min, the BP and HR raised, and ST-segment returned to normal. The occluder was successfully released after the stable condition of the patient. Then, RFCA was sequentially performed. When isolating the right pulmonary veins, the patient's BP and HR fell again with ST-segment elevation in inferior leads. Spontaneous ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation developed rapidly and defibrillation was performed immediately with success. Coronary angiography revealed the obstruction of the right coronary artery which disappeared completely after intracoronary nitroglycerin injection (1 mg). Under systemic diltiazem infusion, the RFCA procedure was accomplished. After the procedure, the patient recovered without any neurologic deficit, and CAS has never recurred with isosorbide mononitrate treatment during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: CAS is a rare complication associated with AF hybrid procedure. Attention should be paid to this rare but potentially life-threatening complication.